1907

Clear Creek Water Co. v. Gladeville Improvement Co.


Supreme Court of Virginia
107 Va. 278, 58 S.E. 586
 

Water Company, a public service corporation, had the power to condemn any interest in property for its purposes. Company filed a petition to condemn certain riparian rights to provide water to Norton citizens through diverting the waters of Clear Creek. Trial court sustained demurrer of Gladeville, holding that water rights alone could not be condemned, but that whole interest in the land must be taken. Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Interests in water were subject to the law of eminent domain. When the waters of a stream were diverted, the inferior riparian owner was entitled to compensation for the use of the water for which he was deprived. The Company needed to divert the water of the stream for its purposes, but had no need to use the bed of the creek.

Summary prepared by Judge Jonathan Apgar, 23rd Judicial Circuit in Virginia, for the William & Mary Property Rights Project, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, William & Mary ©2019.


Back to Case Finder Main Page
Volume One Indexes: 
 To Case Name Index
 To Topic Index
To Date Index
To Code Section Index