1964
Gaumont v. State Highway Comm’r
Supreme Court of Virginia
205 Va. 223, 135 S.E.2d 790
In an eminent domain proceeding to acquire the house and lot of the landowners, the trial court rejected certain testimony and instructions of the landowners. Supreme Court affirmed. Objection to exclusion of the testimony was not timely made and preserved for appeal. Instructions offered by landowners were erroneous and misleading.
Summary prepared by Judge Jonathan Apgar, 23rd Judicial Circuit in Virginia, for the William & Mary Property Rights Project, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, William & Mary ©2019.
Back to Case Finder Main Page
Volume One Indexes:
To Case Name Index
To Topic Index
To Date Index
To Code Section Index