1935

Oliver v. Richmond


Supreme Court of Virginia
165 Va. 538, 178 S.E. 48
 

Landowners claimed that by moving the water course of the James River away from their land for improved navigation, the City would cause future damage to landowners’ property. None of their lands were taken by condemnation. City asserted that there was no such thing as private ownership in the flow of a navigable stream, and the City could divert the water. Landowners were allowed damages and trial court affirmed award. Supreme Court reversed. The waters of a navigable stream were not subject to private ownership, and any riparian rights were subordinate to the public right of navigation. As there was no taking of property, the riparian owner was not allowed compensation for consequential damage.

Summary prepared by Judge Jonathan Apgar, 23rd Judicial Circuit in Virginia, for the William & Mary Property Rights Project, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, William & Mary ©2019.


Back to Case Finder Main Page
Volume One Indexes: 
 To Case Name Index
 To Topic Index
To Date Index
To Code Section Index