2007

Scott v. Walker


Supreme Court of Virginia
274 Va. 209, 645 S.E.2d 278
 

Scotts were renting their single-family residence for short-term periods, nightly or weekly. Walker, a neighbor in the subdivision, sought injunctive relief, asserting that such rentals were in violation of a restrictive covenant which prohibited use of the lot except for residential purposes.  Trial court held that such rentals were not for residential purposes and granted injunction. Supreme Court reversed. Court held that restrictive covenants are not favored and are to   be construed strictly against the person seeking to enforce them. The term residential purposes was to distinguish use from business or commercial purposes. Short-term rentals are residential in nature and are not prohibited by the covenant. If the covenant has an ambiguity, it must be interpreted in favor of the free use of the property and against restrictions.

Summary prepared by Judge Jonathan Apgar, 23rd Judicial Circuit in Virginia, for the William & Mary Property Rights Project, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, William & Mary ©2019.


Back to Case Finder Main Page
Volume One Indexes: 
 To Case Name Index
 To Topic Index
To Date Index
To Code Section Index