1964
Va. Elec. & Power Co. v. Farrar
Supreme Court of Virginia
205 Va. 244, 135 S.E.2d 807
VEPCO was building a hydroelectric dam and sought to condemn upstream creek bed and banks up to the 214 foot contour level to clear logs and debris. After commissioners set just compensation awards, VEPCO contended that by allowing landowners’ witnesses to testify that taking the property would cause the remaining lands to be flooded, the trial court caused commissioners to arrive at a grossly excessive award. VEPCO contended that such flooding was an impossibility. Supreme Court reversed and remanded. It was obvious that the evidence of future flooding played an important part in the awards by the commissioners. The commissioners were not to compute, consider or make an award for any possible future claims of flooding caused by the power company beyond the limits of the property to be acquired. The awards were set aside.
Summary prepared by Judge Jonathan Apgar, 23rd Judicial Circuit in Virginia, for the William & Mary Property Rights Project, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, William & Mary ©2019.
Back to Case Finder Main Page
Volume One Indexes:
To Case Name Index
To Topic Index
To Date Index
To Code Section Index