Are “We All Textualists Now?” Business & Statutory Interpretation Cases
On Saturday, September 11, at 2:00pm, the Supreme Court Preview will feature a panel titled "Are 'we all textualists now?' A look at the business cases and statutory interpretation puzzles on the docket." Justice Kagan famously quipped that “we are all textualists now” and statutory interpretation has certainly become part of the Court’s bread and butter. This term the Court has granted several cases involving questions of statutory interpretation many involving business interests. This panel will preview those cases and also speculate on whether the Roberts Court can be fairly labeled pro-business and / or pro-textualism. On this page, you will find relevant articles and materials related to this topic.
- Supreme Court Grants Review of Scope of PSLRA Stay – JD Supra
- High Court to Consider Intent Bar in H&M Copyright Escape – Kyle Jahner, Bloomberg
- Supreme Court Poised to Resolve Split Regarding Federal Courts’ Jurisdiction to Confirm or Vacate Arbitration Awards – Jeremy K. Beecher, American Bar Association
- Supreme Court to Review Application of Hospital Medicare Drug Reimbursement Statute – Lisa Soronen, National Conference of State Legislatures
- Which Textualism? Tara Leigh Grove, Harvard Law Review
- The Supreme Court's Conservatives Are Embracing a Brand of Textualism Too Extreme for Antonin Scalia - Jacob Finkel, SLATE